Contents

Disaster Risk Reduction programming

Disaster Preparedness Planning

Institutional & Legal Frameworks

Key Normative & Legal Instruments

Coordination

Risk Analysis

Early Warning

Capacity Assessment/ Capacity Building

Information Management

Contingency Planning

Simulations

Needs Assessment

Preparedness for Early Recovery

Staff Safety and Security


Other Preparedness Material

Suggested Preparedness Checklist

Quick guide: First Actions to take in the event of a disaster

Training/ workshop material on preparedness


OCHA Web Links

OCHA Online

ReliefWeb

ReliefWeb Disaster Preparedness page

OCHA Online - Customs Facilitation


External Web links

IFRC IDRL Programme

IDRL Database

OHCHR - Int'l Human Rights Law

ISDR

UN Office of Legal Affairs

RSG on Human Rights of IDPs

IOM's International Migration Law Database

International Development Law Organisation (IDML)


Contact OCHA

Contacts

We are currently reviewing the Toolkit and would be most grateful to have your views. Please take 30 seconds to answer our four questions by clicking here.

Institutional and Legal Frameworks for Disaster Preparedness and Response

Print this page

This page provides information and reference documents/ tools for understanding and improving institutional and legal frameworks for disaster preparedness and response. It is structured into:

Introduction

"A country's legislative and governmental systems provide the basis for plans and organisation in all areas of disaster risk reduction [including preparedness and response]. An adequate institutional basis as well as good governance, therefore, is an important prerequisite for disaster risk management." (UN/ISDR, 2007. Words Into Action: A Guide for Implementing the Hyogo Framework. Geneva, Switzerland, p.21)

Return to top of page


Suggested Use of Terms

There are many different ways of referring to institutional and legal frameworks, i.e. institutional architecture, structure or framework; legal, legislative, regulatory frameworks. The suggested use of terms below stems from the thematic discussion paper "Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction" prepared by UNDP/BCPR, the Provention Consortium Secretariat, UN-Habitat, and UNV with the support of the UN/ISDR for the World Conference on Disaster Reduction, January 2005, Kobe, Japan.

Legal and regulatory frameworks comprise the laws, executive orders and other legal instruments that set the ground rules for governmental and non-governmental activities relating to disasters and risk reduction. They define the authorities, responsibilities and roles of officials and organisations, establish legal authority for organisations and programmes, and sometimes create organisations and coordination mechanisms. They may dictate or encourage relevant policies, practices and processes.

Institutional frameworks and structures comprise all organisations or institutions with a recognised role to play in disaster risk management, the mechanism for coordination between them, their human resources, funding, equipment and supplies, leadership and effectiveness. Appropriate institutional frameworks are needed to carry out policies and legislative measures.

Return to top of page


Legal and regulatory frameworks

Of the 119 national reports submitted to the World Conference on Disaster Reduction, Kobe, 2005, 80 % included some form of legislation for disaster management. Typically, the national legal and regulatory framework is governed by a core piece of legislation, often referred to as the National Disaster Management Act. The latter is often quite vague and generally requires specific implementing regulations with details on how the law should be implemented in certain areas. The recently adopted Disaster Management Law of Indonesia (April 2007) for example called for specific implementing regulations to be enacted by the Government including one on the role of international institutions and international non-governmental institutions in disaster management in the country.

Disaster management legislation should not necessarily be equalled to disaster risk reduction legislation. The summary of national reports submitted to the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (2005) finds that "many governments, to their credit, have for some time recognised the importance of shifting from an emphasis on disaster management and response to the wider considerations of disaster risk reduction. However, many legislative initiatives and political mechanisms are still mainly focused on disaster management." The summary of national reports can be accessed here; the national reports are accessible on the ISDR website at www.unisdr.org/wcdr/preparatory-process/national-reports.htm.

The existence of appropriate national legislation with respect to disaster management is of particular interest not only to the country itself but to all disaster relief actors. Indeed, legal problems occur in many disaster settings when international assistance is required and the latter is not sufficiently addressed in the national legal framework. Problems include delayed customs clearance and issuance of visas for relief workers, the legal status of organisations and many more.

The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) has over the last years led a process of research and consultations that led in November 2007 to the unanimous adoption of the "Guidelines for the Domestic Facilitation and Regulation of International Disaster Relief and Initial Recovery Assistance" by all state parties to the Geneva Conventions and the components of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (also available here in French and Spanish). The Guidelines

A factsheet on the Guidelines is also available in English, French and Spanish.

More information about the IDRL Programme can be found at www.ifrc.org/what/disasters/idrl/

Return to top of page


Institutional frameworks and structures

Where a National Disaster Management Act exists, it usually describes the overall institutional framework and structures, i.e. the National Disaster Management Office (NDMO), if existing, and its cooperation with other relevant actors. Whilst the institutional framework should indeed be based on appropriate legislation, it covers more than that. Ideally, the institutional framework is described in the National Disaster Management Plan with details on coordination structures (both horizontal and vertical) between various actors involved, their human resources, Standard Operating Procedures, other types of agreements, funding, equipment and supplies, etc.

A study prepared by InterWorks in 1998 for the UN Disaster Management Training Programme (DMTP) found that national disaster management models generally fall into three main categories. (UNDMTP, Model for a National Disaster Management Structure, Preparedness Plan, and Supporting Legislation, InterWorks, 1998)

  1. The NDMO is located in the Prime Minister's Office:
  2. The NDMO is located in a line ministry:
  3. There is no signle NDMO but certain ministries that have their own disaster units or departments:

According to the previously mentioned thematic discussion paper Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction prepared for the WCDR in Kobe, 2005, option 1 is the recommended structure. "It is widely believed that a strong, well located or central agency/ authority for disaster and risk management is a key element in the institutional framework, providing a visible focal point for the management and reduction of risk as well as efficient emergency response. Successful nodal agencies facilitate a coherent approach to disaster management and provide a framework for coordinated action. But it is vitally important that such agencies demonstrate leadership and professional competence, and earn the confidence and support of stakeholders at all levels. In practice, such calibre and commitment are often lacking. It must be acknowledged that in many if not most countries such agencies originated to undertake disaster response/civil defence activities and have found it difficult to adjust to new, holistic, approaches to risk management."

Return to top of page


Useful resources and tools


Return to top of page